It's remarkable how much has not changed in 5 years - in a good way. The difficult problems that Juan and Protocol Labs set out to solve are still difficult problems, and they are still the ones that Protocol today is aiming to solve.
Incentivizing decentralized storage and compute
Designing organizations that can reliably produce Bell Labs-like returns
Experimenting with incentives for communities that yield
Solving the "credit assignment problem"
"if you have a set of agents that are participating in a set of endeavors, and those endeavors either create or destroy value, how do you correctly propagate reward back to the agents?"
Similarly surprising was the degree to which the interviewer (Dalton Banks?) just DOES NOT GET IT.
Protocol, Juan, etc, do NOT fit the Silicon Valley playbook
Juan is consistently thinking one level above Dalton. Dalton is asking for a specific example of a single consumer use case that will be the "killer app."
Juan responds with: a whole new set of capabilities have been unleashed.
The strongest single argument is about simplifying financial incentives.
"The reason I mentioned financial instruments is because that is a fundamental innovation that both Bitcoin and Ethereum use, the ability to create financial instruments extremely cheaply without spending tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Instead, writing a few lines of code. You don’t have to litigate this in court. If it goes wrong, it just automatically settles in a computer. What happened with the blockchain stuff is that software began to eat finance and law in a way that had never happened before."
"When you take that idea, of you saying create a very strong financial incentive for people to do something around the planet, and you then couple it with building some other kind of resource-sharing network, something like file storage, you can organize this massive, massive network, as well."
Achieving Paretotopia with Regenerative Cryptoecon - Talk